Other plausible moves are 2.Bb4 and 2.Bc5 both of which attempt to initiate a counter-attack.įor explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation. This allows Black to capture the pawn when it gets to f4, without having their active knight subsequently kicked by the e-pawn. The most common reply as it prepares to counter f4 with d5, adding to the equation another variable for White to keep track of. The harder White tries to checkmate you, the less time they have to develop naturally and control territory consequently, if you survive the opening your hand is a little freer than in the Ruy Lopez.īlack for the moment has no threat to respond to, save the threat of f4 which cannot be reasonably prevented. If you should find yourself up against the Vienna as Black, keep your nerve. d6, what Ive previous called the 'Philidor-ish Defense'. Now it is possible to play f4 on the second move, for the King's Gambit, but when no Black piece has yet declared its intentions is there not a degree of hit-and-hope about such a move? If you have the patience to let Black build their bridge before you blow it up: welcome to the Vienna Game, a poison-tipped opening from the nineteenth century. In the Vienna Game, a somewhat uncommon response by Black is the conservative 2. White's wish is to advance the f-pawn two squares to remove Black's powerful e5 pawn and strike at the heart of their position. "I can’t fault Ovetchkin and Soloviov in their efforts to make the opening attractive to possible readers and they have indeed managed to find some bite in White’s set-up. Still, after 4.f4 d6, there arises another question - 5.Nf3, or 5.d3 It often happens that there arise the same positions after these. GM Glenn Flear, author of 'Starting Out: The open Games': IM Sergei Soloviov and Grandmaster Roman Ovetchkin both are experienced players, trainers and chess authors. In addition, Black can go for the seemingly peaceful Petroff Defence. This does not happen after the move 2.Nf3 when Black can choose then between the numerous variations of the Ruy Lopez (or the rather solid Steinitz Defence Deferred, or the super-solid Berlin Wall, or the sharp Marshall Attack). Soloviov and Ovetchkin have come to the conclusion that the move 4.f4!? is more precise.īy choosing the Vienna Game, White follows his own line of playing. Should he thrust immediately f4, or begin at first with d3? Should he advance his pawn to f5, or prefer a quick piece development? For example, after 2.Nf6 3.Bc4 Bc5, should White play at first d3, fortifying his e4-pawn? f4 d6, there arises another question 5.Nf3, or 5.d3 It often happens that there arise the same positions after these moves, but still, we had to analyse. IM Sergei Soloviov and Grandmaster Roman Ovetchkin had to make decisions how to play with White practically from the first several moves. The Vienna set-up aims for very aggressive play, which often includes sacrifices.īut White prefers to be on the safe side, without burning all the bridges and to try to justify his actions from the point of view of positional play as well.Īt first, he deploys his minor pieces to active positions, then he advances the thematic move f4, castles (usually on the kingside) and begins an attack only after all this.ĭespite the fact that the move 2.Nc3 has been played for more than a hundred years, there has not been defined a clear-cut scheme for playing this set-up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |